Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 76 to 82 of 82

Thread: Failiure to comply with the (new?) Scout Curriculum

  1. #76
    Group Scout Leader
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Stanstead Abbotts, Hertfordshire
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked 179 Times in 99 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Donnelly View Post
    Pretty much everything else is train, support, manage, develop, etc. Compliance with a 'curriculum' in any form will only get people's backs up and generate needless work. Assuming any meaningful monitoring could be achieved at all - afterall were is anyone going to get such data?
    What TSA need is a mandatory online tool that tracks programme achievements (badges) for every individual youth member.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pstretch For This Useful Post:

    Matt Donnelly (12-04-2018),Neil Williams (12-04-2018),shiftypete (12-04-2018)

  3. #77
    Very Old Member BigBadBaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bracknell, Berkshire
    Posts
    4,419
    Thanks
    1,409
    Thanked 858 Times in 542 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pstretch View Post
    What TSA need is a mandatory online tool that tracks programme achievements (badges) for every individual youth member.
    Ohhh - that's a good idea!
    Peter

    Former CSL - 2nd Bracknell


    A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step. Lao Tzu (600 BC - 531 BC)

  4. #78
    ESL and DESC ianw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    6,112
    Thanks
    1,343
    Thanked 1,830 Times in 1,064 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by pstretch View Post
    What TSA need is a mandatory online tool that tracks programme achievements (badges) for every individual youth member.
    Can't be far off. I mean, yeah, it's not mandatory, and TSA don't run it but...

    I had cause to try and share an event with scout sections, in the interests of linking with explorers. I ended up discovering that every group in my district uses it, and all bar one scout section in one group is set up. Of course, there's a world of difference between having an OSM section set up, and using OSM to actively track badges. Some have accepted my event, passed it on, and their scouts have signed up, for some, it's still "pending".

    In a way, it's a good analogy to this debate of "curriculum" and "compliance". Showing the variety out there, from those actively using OSM for everything from badges to events, to those not using it, to those who've set up a section because they were told to and not much more. That we're all volunteers, and you can only compel us to do so much before we either start ignoring it, or take our bat and ball and go home. Know what I mean?
    Ian Wilkins
    Farnham District Explorer Scout Commissioner

    Jambowlree - Worldwide Scout Ten Pin Bowling Competition
    All sections, all countries, runs December 2017 - May 2018
    http://www.jambowlree.org

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ianw For This Useful Post:

    Neil Williams (12-04-2018),nevynxxx (12-04-2018)

  6. #79
    ASL and YLUL wealdbrook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,092
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 443 Times in 178 Posts
    Scouting is all about giving our young people the best experiences we can - what is the most appropriate for one group may not be right for another group, our young people are all individuals.
    We are all individuals and we bring many "life skills" to our sections, many are "scouting" but they are wider than that. We deliver a programme we think fits the needs and interests of our young people to help them to achieve their full physical, intellectual, social and spiritual potential as individuals, as responsible citizens and as members of their local, national and international communities.
    Since they are all individuals it is hard to have a one size fits all curriculum and the value of what we deliver is often only seen years after delivery.
    John Alexander,
    ASL and Assistant Webmaster
    1st Weald Brook
    http://www.1stwealdbrook.org.uk
    ESL(YL) Brentwood District

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to wealdbrook For This Useful Post:

    Dave Davies (13-04-2018)

  8. #80
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eccleshall
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
    Scouting always has had a curriculum - "Scouting For Boys", with a little bit of updating it is as relevant now as it always has been. Any competent scouter can adapt it to suit local needs.

    The Scout Association want everyone to believe that they are some form of statutory body with the sole rights to control scouting. They are not and you don't need their permission, anyone can run a scout group and you don't need anyone else's permission. TSA is just an advisory body without any executive authority over you or your group; and nothing more.

    Compass is just a means to ensure compliance; you don't need a computer to manage thirty-six scouts.

    Kingsley Leigh
    Former Leader of 1st Eccleshall Explorer Scout Unit
    Dismissed from Scouting by Bullying Thugs

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by pstretch View Post
    What TSA need is a mandatory online tool that tracks programme achievements (badges) for every individual youth member.
    It's Scouting - not McDonalds!

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kingsley For This Useful Post:

    Brian Foulkes (13-04-2018),Bushfella (15-04-2018)

  10. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sidmouth,Devon
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 36 Times in 22 Posts
    Well said

    I entirely agree with you But I think we are being overtaken by people with different thoughts about Scouting. I seem to be meeting more and more people ,admittedly not dunning sections,who seem to have a very different idea than mine about what Scouting is all about.

  11. #82
    Keith at 2M Keith at 2M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    878
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 130 Times in 77 Posts
    "UK Commissioner Programme – Assurance
    To lead the strategic development of the youth programme (the curriculum and compliance) with the outcome of increasing the number of young people involved in UK Scouting."


    I think if you run this through Google Translate it will come up with something like 'increasing the number of young people in scouting by providing a relevant, safe and fun programme' so no real problem there, other than the need to covert it into plain English. Plus we already have a youth lead compliance programme for assessing the quality of the programme - its called voting with their feet. Its very rare for a group that doesn't provide a half decent programme to do well on the numbers front. Units that close due to a lack of numbers are usually saying something about the quality of the programme/leadership. Maybe a 'compliance' visit from OfScout might have helped and saved the unit but do those sort of leaders ever actually listen to advice.

    I'm not sure how anyone can object to a compliance review of our Safety/Safeguarding/Inclusivity - as a parent I'd like to be certain my child's group follows the latest safety rules and legislation. I'd like to be confident that the money I pay to the Group is managed properly and I'd like to be reassured that my data and that of my children is managed in accordance with GDPR etc. I don't think that is too much to ask and have no objection to being asked to prove that my section follows all these rules either.

    What I am really concerned about is where these additional compliance officers are going to come from. We already struggle to staff all of the sections and yet we're going to be able to come up with a couple of extra volunteers per District? Having friends & relatives working in education, the general consensus is that today's Ofsted inspectors are largely people who couldn't cope with the pressures of teaching so now make a living judging their former colleagues. Extending this to scouting really frightens me. The only 'spare' people we tend to have (ie volunteers without current posts) are those not considered suitable to be effective leaders. The thought that these individuals would be the only ready source of volunteers to go round passing judgement on the rest of the District worries me? I don't think this sounds a workable scenario and would lead to current leaders just deciding to walk.
    Last edited by Keith at 2M; 17-04-2018 at 05:14 PM.
    The Roman Empire did not become great by holding meetings. It did so by killing everyone that opposed their point of view.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Keith at 2M For This Useful Post:

    dralphs (17-04-2018),richardnhunt (17-04-2018)

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456

Similar Threads

  1. Mixed scout and non scout group using scout campsite
    By CambridgeSkip in forum Campsites & Camping
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-07-2016, 10:15 PM
  2. Ideas for evening based on Scout law/respect - Scout section
    By Richard T in forum Programme Ideas & Resources
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-03-2013, 10:18 PM
  3. Wiring about being a scouter on a Curriculum Vitae
    By tdjno in forum Scouting Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 28-01-2010, 11:40 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 21-11-2009, 09:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •